The Silent Genocide of the White Race
Part II: The United States
In the United States, whites have historically accounted for more than 80% of the total population. Between the Civil War and Vietnam eras — a period spanning an entire century — the U.S. was approximately 90% white. Since the 1970s, the white population — stated as a percentage of the total population — has been in freefall. The 2000 Census reported that, for the first time in U.S. history, whites represented less than 80% of the total population. This alarming trend is expected to accelerate in the future as birthrates of non-white races are demonstrably higher than the dwindling white birthrate. According to the Brookings Institution, “the U.S. minority population grew at five times the rate of whites since 2000.” Based on demographic trends, experts are predicting that minorities will outnumber whites in the U.S. by 2050.
In his book Death of the West, Pat Buchanan posted a speech made by former President Bill Clinton, given at a liberal university during his second term in office:
“Today, largely because of immigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New York City. Within five years there will be no majority race in our largest state, California. In a little more than fifty years there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time.”
…as if government-sanctioned genocide of our race is a wonderful thing to be celebrated.
So how did we arrive at this point, and who is the driving force behind the ongoing displacement of the white population in the United States?
THE JEWISH ROLE IN THE TRANSATLANTIC SLAVE TRADE
Between the 16th and 19th Centuries, slaves — many of whom were white Europeans — were transported to the New World against their will. This was undoubtedly a reprehensible practice that stemmed from excessive avarice. What is relatively unknown is the fact that Jews — not White Anglo-Saxon Christians — were the ones who orchestrated the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Many Jewish writers and historians have pointed this out themselves. In Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History, Marc Raphael wrote the following on this matter:
“Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.
This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the “triangular trade” that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750s, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760s, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760s and early 1770s dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent.”
In New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten, S.B. Liebman wrote:
“They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale. They were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise. The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains.”
And Arnold Wiznitzer, author of Jews in Colonial Brazil, described in even greater detail the predominant Jewish role in New World slavery:
“The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates. If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644.”
Jews not only orchestrated the trans-Atlantic slave trade, but also held slaves in disproportionate numbers. In United States Jewry, published in 1989, Jacob Raider Marcus wrote:
“All through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth, Jews in the North were to own black servants; in the South, the few plantations owned by Jews were tilled with slave labor. In 1820, over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic servants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish households in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South, where they were always outnumbered at least 100 to 1. Very few Jews anywhere in the United States protested against chattel slavery on moral grounds.”
Abraham Lincoln, who is credited for “freeing the slaves,” intended to have the slaves repatriated to Africa following the Civil War. Unfortunately, the Sixteenth President was assassinated less than one week following Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. Lincoln made clear his intentions during various speeches and addresses:
“Let us be brought to believe it is morally right, and at the same time, favorable to, or at least not against, our interest, to transfer the African to his native clime, and we shall find a way to do it, however great the task may be.” – Abraham Lincoln in an 1857 address in Springfield, Illinois
“There is no room for two distinct races of white men in America, much less for two distinct races of whites and blacks. I can conceive of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal.” – Abraham Lincoln
After Lincoln’s assassination, the prevailing policy in America was one of reconstruction, not repatriation. This process accelerated under the administration of former Union General Ulysses S. Grant, whose civil rights policies appeased the Radical Republicans of the time.
THE JEWISH ROLE IN INTEGRATION & MULTICULTURALISM
The races remained largely segregated until the 1950s and 1960s, when Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education; Jim Crow laws were repealed; the Civil Rights Act was passed in the mid-1960s; and whites were forced to accept racial integration at gunpoint.
It is quite astonishing that Jews — who played an instrumental role in the transport of African slaves to this continent — were also the driving force behind racial integration between blacks and whites. The NAACP was a predominantly Jewish organization in its formative years; many of Martin Luther King Jr.’s speeches were composed by Stanley David Levinson, a Jewish Communist; and according to Howard Sachar of myjewishlearning.com, “Many local and state desegregation regulations actually were drafted in the offices of the Jewish agencies.”
It is equally astounding that Jewish Supremacists, who advocate racial homogeneity for Israel, simultaneously promote multiculturalism and diversity for traditionally white nations. This double standard couldn’t be any more obvious. As long as other groups (e.g., Palestinians) are not infringed upon — and no U.S. tax dollars are wasted — Jews have every right to take steps to preserve their heritage. Every group of people should have this right, and people of European heritage are no exception.
Whereas Israel is effectively sealing off its borders to mitigate the inflow of outsiders, the floodgates remain open in the U.S. and other white-majority nations. The Jewish Supremacists and white sellouts — like Bill Clinton — share culpability. I will deal with the former, as many people remain unaware of the influential Jewish role in integration, immigration, and forced diversity.
Just as Jews have a vested interest in enforcing protectionism for the Israeli state, they also have a vested interest in flooding our countries with non-white immigrants. On the latter, Charles Silberman, author of A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today, wrote:
“American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse “gay rights” and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called “social issues.”
As you can see, prevailing Jewish values are incompatible with ours. However, as Jews account for only 2% of the total population, they cannot win their battles without some help — which is why they have attempted to liberalize the majority population in the U.S. and West, and have also provided unyielding support for the immigration of peoples whose cultures and ideologies conflict with ours.
The Immigration Act of 1965 — which ushered in an era of non-white preference in immigration policy — was predominately influenced by powerful Jewish Congressmen and lobbyists. After this law was enacted, Jews in America rejoiced! Earl Raab, executive director of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy and associate of the ADL, wrote the following in the Jewish Bulletin:
“It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.”
He went onto applaud the demographic shift that has taken place in the United States over the past half-century, stating that:
“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.
We [i.e., Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”
It is worth noting that the “Nazi-Aryan party” would never have risen to power in Germany were it not for Jews infiltrating — and subsequently corrupting — the most important institutions in the Wiemar Republic, just as they have done in the United States since WWII. In Main Kampf, Adolf Hitler laid out quite eloquently his reasons for turning against the Jews of his time. While I personally do not advocate Hitleresque measures, I do believe it to be necessary for whites — at least those who would prefer not to live in a multicultural society run by Jews — to form our own government that would enforce racial homogeneity and represent our sociopolitical interests. This is clearly not possible in America today. Essentially, my proposed white nation would be to White Nationalists what Israel is to the Jews. Only we would rely exclusively on ourselves for national defense.
The Jews being expelled from more than 100 locations throughout human history can be attributed to self-preservation (on the part of the host civilization), not antisemitism. If whites wish to preserve their heritage, they must first jettison the cancerous Jewish influence, for their values are diametrically opposed to ours. The time is now. We can ill-afford to wait until we become the minority population in the country we established. I repeat: the time is now!
Source blog: http://nofeministsallowed.blogspot.com
