‘Ghost Nation’
This websites talks about the devolution of society through the forced implementation feminism, Zionism, hollyweird entertainment, degenerate public schools, the lamestream media and other sadistic forced programs. Live in femerica long enough and you will become an animal.
Top Ten Reasons Why American Women Suck
Post By VladTepes
1 ) Selfish – to the point where they don’t know the difference between love of self and plain downright greed–and drilled into believing that whatever happens is the fault of whatever man is in their life because of the feminist crud drilled into them by the cadre of asexual closet cases called “therapists” who appear on “Ricki”, “Oprah” or other such electronic drivel
2 ) Deluded – into thinking they “deserve” a rich, model-handsome husband who will “take them away from all of this”–whatever the “this” might be–and leading to resentment when they discover that the universe does not revolve around them
3 ) Angry – all the damn time about things which are so far out of their control as to be nonsensical–and constantly wanting to “discuss” this mind numbing drivel ad nauseam
4 ) Psychotic – multiple personalities in the same woman – as “Nomad” put it in the “Star Trek” episode: “Woman…a mass of inconsistencies…”, and also when the feminist voices in their heads start with the regrets and victim acculturation
5 ) Worthless – anything that does not immediately resolve itself in her favor or to her benefit is meaningless to her, especially husband and family
6 ) Lazy – drilled into their head that they “deserve” a maid, nanny and personal slave to take care of every detail – and that their husband/boyfriend is required to cater to their each and every mindless whim
7 ) Resentful – especially of other women who have things that they do not, in material, spiritual and esoteric senses
8 ) Greedy – to them, “housekeeping” means getting the house in the divorce (thanks to Zsa Zsa for that immortal line) and sucking the guy for every last cent, even if they had nothing to do with the building of the nest egg
9 ) Mindless – constant, irritating, idle prattle about topics they read about in some women’s magazine and then become instant experts–particularly pop psychology and the latest crap they see on “Oprah” or “Ricki”
10 ) Vain – believing that they are irresistible to everything in pants and therefore are allowed to behave sluttish and without any honor
Grr….
If you are wondering where the original American Women Suck forum is then that would be here. We changed the name because 99% of the attacks over a 7 year period were from males. Go figure.
The Silent Genocide of the White Race
Part V: Conclusion
In a 2009 speech, former U.S. President Bill Clinton acknowledged that the empowerment of women is requisite for population control. From CNN’s website:
While politicians bicker over cap-and-trade legislation, Bill Clinton is looking to the empowerment of women as a weapon for fighting global warming. “In every single society in which that has happened, there’s been a moderation in population growth,” said Clinton. Because population growth is seen as a major contributor to rising levels of greenhouse gas, Clinton believes that putting girls in school and giving them access to microcredit, capital, and labor markets will temper both the birth rate and climate change. “We need to find a morally acceptable way to slow down the population explosion in the countries that can’t take care of the people they’ve got now.”
It can be implied from Clinton’s speech that feminism is a systematic weapon that has been used against traditionally white societies over the past fifty years. Europeans — and those of European descent — were the first guinea pigs affected by the elite’s population control experiment. And without exception, Jewish Supremacists orchestrated every movement detrimental to the white race, including feminism.
I am outraged. You should be outraged. This is genocide by design. Whites are rapidly approaching minority status in the nations their ancestors built through blood, sweat, and tears. Wanting to preserve one’s culture, heritage, and bloodlines is not racist. It is a survival mechanism inherent to all human beings, irrespective of race. No group of people should have their homelands flooded with alien races against their will. Similarly, no culture should be subjected to the destructive forces of feminism, homosexuality, promiscuity, and forced diversity.
My problem lies not with everyday blacks, mestizos, Asians, and other non-whites. In addition, those who wish to live in a multicultural society should have every right to do so. Similarly, those who are of the opinion that a racially homogeneous society would be overall preferable to a multicultural one should be able to live in the former. Unfortunately, whites do not have this option — not in North America, not in Australia, and not even in Europe. As I have revealed in this five-part series, the Jewish Supremacists have colluded with their powerful, race-betraying co-conspirators to facilitate the demise of the white race — the same race that brought you Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, Leonardo da Vinci, Galileo, Michelangelo, Picasso, Rembrandt, Van Gogh, Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, William Shakespeare, Mark Twain, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Isaac Newton, Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham Bell, Nikola Tesla, Johannes Gutenberg, Samuel Morse, the Wright Brothers, Neil Armstrong, Christopher Columbus, Leif Ericsson, Marco Polo, Charles Martel, and many other legendary historical figures.
Source blog: http://nofeministsallowed.blogspot.com
The Silent Genocide of the White Race
Part IV: Our Ancestral Homelands
Without our consent, the nefarious social engineers have deliberately flooded our countries with non-white immigrants from every corner of the globe — resulting in increased crime, more people competing for fewer resources, more votes being cast against white interests, and whites losing demographic ground in their own countries. Not even our ancestral homelands in Europe have been spared from this demographic assault launched against white populations worldwide.
The Silent Genocide of whites in their homelands is a multi-phase process that has been repeated throughout the contemporary western world:
STEP ONE: SOCIAL WARFARE
The promotion of feminism; introduction of birth control; legalization of abortion; tolerance of homosexuality; normalization of miscegenation; and spread of other forms of cultural pesticide throughout the targeted white nation.
STEP TWO: DEMOGRAPHIC DECLINE
As a result of the aforementioned social warfare, birthrates decline.
STEP THREE: MASS IMMIGRATION OF NON-WHITES
In response to birthrates being below replacement levels, leaders of the targeted white nations suggest opening the floodgates to non-white immigrants from the third-world.
STEP FOUR: NON-WHITES OUTNUMBER WHITES
Eventually, whites become a minority in the countries their ancestors founded.
STEP FIVE: NON-WHITES GO ON THE OFFENSIVE
As whites become demographically vulnerable, non-whites begin to ramp up their violent attacks on outnumbered whites, as seen in South Africa and Zimbabwe.
This process is being repeated throughout the entire white, western world — not only in countries like the United States, Canada, and Australia, but also in European countries in which whites are indigenous.
UNITED KINGDOM
A 2009 Telegraph article revealed that the Labour Party deliberately “threw open Britain’s borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a truly multicultural country.” It was further disclosed that “rubbing the Right’s nose in diversity” was their chief motive.
As race traitors like Tony Blair were celebrating a more diverse U.K., non-white immigrants were forming violent gangs, raping white girls, increasing the murder rate, and committing various other crimes. Actually, the race traitors were not celebrating. Rather, they were actively concealing reports that linked increased immigration to increased crime.
In a recent speech delivered in Oldham, BNP leader Nick Griffin had the following to say on these terrible crimes:
“We are dealing with these gangs of paedophile rapists and I have no doubt if the men and the boys who fought and died in the First and Second World Wars were to come back now, they would be disgusted, they would be angry, and they would be with us.”
People are beginning to see through the lies and wake up, however. A recent poll revealed that more than 80% of Britons favor tighter immigration controls. The same survey also found that roughly three-quarters of people are concerned about the white British population becoming a minority by 2066.
FRANCE
While watching the 2010 World Cup, I couldn’t help but notice that France’s squad was comprised mostly of black players; I also couldn’t help but wonder what the heroic Charles Martel would think if he were alive today.
Almost 1,300 years after Martel drove Muslim invaders out of what is now France, close to five million Africans and Turks are estimated to be living in France. These African and Arab immigrants have conducted numerous race riots over the past decade, the most infamous of which occurred in 2005. From the aforelinked New York Times article:
“Over the succeeding decades, North African and sub-Saharan immigrants replaced the working-class French who initially populated the neighborhoods. But jobs have dried up as the economy slowed – unemployment in some of the zones is as high as 30 percent – and the suburbs have become the French equivalent of America’s inner cities.
While labor immigration tightened in the 1980′s, illegal immigration and asylum seekers have kept many of the neighborhoods growing. In 2003, France became the world’s leading destination for asylum seekers, surpassing the United States.”
France’s immigration crisis is of great concern to citizens, as well as to President Nicolas Sarkozy. On the heels of last summer’s race riots, the French President went on record saying that, “We are suffering from 50 years of lax immigration regulation” before adding that “values are disappearing and we have to stop this.” This recent crackdown on immigration and crime helped boost Sarkozy’s approval ratings, which indicates that his constituents are equally fed-up with France’s ongoing immigration crisis.
GERMANY
Germany, whose birthrate slumped to its lowest level ever last year, may require as many as 200,000 immigrants to make up for this deficit, some studies reveal. Germany already has more than 4 million Muslims (> 5% of the population) who are reproducing at significantly higher rates than the native population.
Karl Schmitt, leader of the Pax Europa Citizens Movement, recently told the Global Post, “We see an occupation in this mass immigration.” And German Chancellor Angela Merkel has gone so far as to state that multicultural society has failed, stating:
“And of course, the approach to build a multicultural society and to live side-by-side and to enjoy each other has failed, utterly failed.”
Horst Seehofer, Minister-President of Bavaria, echoed the German Chancellor’s remarks by claiming that “Multikulti is dead.”
SWEDEN
Scandinavia has the highest concentration of blondes in Europe, with light hair being especially prevalent in Sweden.
Sadly, this is changing before our very eyes.
Barbara Lerner of Paideia (The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden) expressed recently that “Jews will play a leading role in multicultural Europe.” She went onto say:
“Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role, and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”
It is worth noting that Ms. Lerner’s Jewish organization receives funding from the Swedish government.
The role of the Swedish government doesn’t stop there, though. In one outrageous, state-sponsored video promoting the silent genocide of whites, Swedes are encouraged to “mix it up” with darker races. The video depicts a blond woman singing the Swedish national anthem while having interracial sex with a black man. It is arguably the most appalling video that I have ever seen!
To the delight of Paideia and the Marxist Swedish government, the non-white invasion of Sweden is well underway, with predictable results. The mass immigration of Africans and Middle Easterners has been accompanied by noticeable spikes in suicide bombings, rapes, robberies, and other crimes. According to Wikipedia’s Crime in Sweden article:
“Immigrants are overrepresented in Sweden’s crime statistics. During the period 1997–2001, 25% of the almost 1,520,000 offences were committed by people born overseas, while almost 20% were committed by Swedish-born people with a foreign background. Those from North Africa and the Middle East were overrepresented.”
But according to Ms. Lerner, the multicultural transformation of Sweden and the rest of Europe is necessary. Necessary to whom? To native Swedes, Germans, French, Britons, Irish, Italians, Spaniards, Russians, et cetera? Or to fellow Jewish Supremacists, who will not relent until the entire white race is wiped out? I think we all know the answer.
Indeed, Europe’s future could be even darker if EU social engineers have their way. Citing low birthrates, the EU statistical agency Eurostat stated that, “Countries with low fertility rates could require a significant number of immigrants over the coming decades if they want to maintain the existing number of people of working age.” Instead of proposing measures to boost existing birthrate levels (stamping out feminism alone would accomplish this), Eurostat has suggested the immigration of 50 million non-whites into Europe as a solution. As if there aren’t already enough Africans, Arabs, and other non-whites running around in our indigenous homelands.
One of these days, the enablers of this silent genocide will push the people too far and will have a revolution on their hands! As far as I am concerned, that day cannot arrive soon enough!
Source blog: http://nofeministsallowed.blogspot.com
The Silent Genocide of the White Race
Part III: The Dark Continent
Whereas minorities in historically white nations enjoy protected class status, likewise cannot be said about whites living in sub-Saharan Africa, who are experiencing a genocide far less “silent” than their North American, European, and Australian counterparts.
Post-apartheid South Africa is one of the most dangerous countries on earth, especially for demographically vulnerable whites. Since the ANC party rose to power in 1994, more than 3,000 white farmers — or Boers — have been murdered in RSA. According to Dr. Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch, “The murder rate of the white farmers are four times as high as is for the rest of the population.”
Additionally, a woman is reportedly raped every 17 seconds in South Africa, with “more white women reporting rape than African women” according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. White males are not immune from this sickening rape epidemic, either, and likewise can be said about small children.
Because many South African blacks still view themselves as victims, even nearly two decades after apartheid, they feel entitled to rob, rape, and kill whites at will. Kill the Boers is a popular anti-white anthem amongst SA blacks, and even Nelson Mandela has shamelessly sung hate songs that incite violence against whites. And when the disturbing Kill the Boers song was finally banned last year, the racist ANC was outraged. Unbelievable.
Whites in South Africa also have to contend with affirmative action. “Blacks get more than whites at the moment,” one interviewee contends. “They’re being pulled forward against us. That’s why all of us are here. It’s very unfair because they told us it was going to be equal, but it’s not equal.”
Naturally, many white refugees have sought asylum in other western nations, much to the South African government’s chagrin. In one recent case, RSA officials convinced the Canadian government to overturn a previous ruling that granted refugee status to Brandon Huntley, a Capetonian who claimed to have been persecuted and attacked in his homeland. Zev Krengel, the SA Jewish Board of Deputies chairman, expressed his initial outrage by saying, “Crime is a problem that impacts on South Africans across the board. If anything, black South Africans are more vulnerable to crime due to the sad historical reality of higher poverty in their communities.” As you can see, not much sympathy is provided for white refugees who have suffered tremendously in post-apartheid South Africa.
RSA’s neighbor to the north, Zimbabwe, is in even worse shape. Formerly known as Rhodesia, Zimbabwe has been home to countless human rights violations and runaway inflation. Its deteriorating economic condition since 2000 is largely attributable to President Robert Mugabe and his Zanu-PF cronies forcing whites off of their land, and subsequently turning said farmlands over to black militants. As reported in The Telegraph, “The land grab, which began in 2000, precipitated the country’s collapse, as it destroyed commercial agriculture, the mainstay of the economy, while Mr Mugabe used gifts of farms to shore up loyalty in his divided party.” Newsweek also acknowledged that “the flight of white farmers led to an agricultural collapse” in Zimbabwe before suggesting that a similar scenario could play out in South Africa.
The plight faced by South Africans and Zimbabweans could very well be experienced by whites worldwide as they become minorities in their own countries. In the next section, I will discuss large-scale, non-white immigration into traditionally white countries, including our ancestral homelands in Europe.
Source blog: http://nofeministsallowed.blogspot.com
The Silent Genocide of the White Race
Part II: The United States
In the United States, whites have historically accounted for more than 80% of the total population. Between the Civil War and Vietnam eras — a period spanning an entire century — the U.S. was approximately 90% white. Since the 1970s, the white population — stated as a percentage of the total population — has been in freefall. The 2000 Census reported that, for the first time in U.S. history, whites represented less than 80% of the total population. This alarming trend is expected to accelerate in the future as birthrates of non-white races are demonstrably higher than the dwindling white birthrate. According to the Brookings Institution, “the U.S. minority population grew at five times the rate of whites since 2000.” Based on demographic trends, experts are predicting that minorities will outnumber whites in the U.S. by 2050.
In his book Death of the West, Pat Buchanan posted a speech made by former President Bill Clinton, given at a liberal university during his second term in office:
“Today, largely because of immigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New York City. Within five years there will be no majority race in our largest state, California. In a little more than fifty years there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time.”
…as if government-sanctioned genocide of our race is a wonderful thing to be celebrated.
So how did we arrive at this point, and who is the driving force behind the ongoing displacement of the white population in the United States?
THE JEWISH ROLE IN THE TRANSATLANTIC SLAVE TRADE
Between the 16th and 19th Centuries, slaves — many of whom were white Europeans — were transported to the New World against their will. This was undoubtedly a reprehensible practice that stemmed from excessive avarice. What is relatively unknown is the fact that Jews — not White Anglo-Saxon Christians — were the ones who orchestrated the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Many Jewish writers and historians have pointed this out themselves. In Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History, Marc Raphael wrote the following on this matter:
“Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.
This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the “triangular trade” that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750s, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760s, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760s and early 1770s dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent.”
In New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten, S.B. Liebman wrote:
“They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale. They were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise. The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains.”
And Arnold Wiznitzer, author of Jews in Colonial Brazil, described in even greater detail the predominant Jewish role in New World slavery:
“The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates. If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644.”
Jews not only orchestrated the trans-Atlantic slave trade, but also held slaves in disproportionate numbers. In United States Jewry, published in 1989, Jacob Raider Marcus wrote:
“All through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth, Jews in the North were to own black servants; in the South, the few plantations owned by Jews were tilled with slave labor. In 1820, over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic servants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish households in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South, where they were always outnumbered at least 100 to 1. Very few Jews anywhere in the United States protested against chattel slavery on moral grounds.”
Abraham Lincoln, who is credited for “freeing the slaves,” intended to have the slaves repatriated to Africa following the Civil War. Unfortunately, the Sixteenth President was assassinated less than one week following Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. Lincoln made clear his intentions during various speeches and addresses:
“Let us be brought to believe it is morally right, and at the same time, favorable to, or at least not against, our interest, to transfer the African to his native clime, and we shall find a way to do it, however great the task may be.” – Abraham Lincoln in an 1857 address in Springfield, Illinois
“There is no room for two distinct races of white men in America, much less for two distinct races of whites and blacks. I can conceive of no greater calamity than the assimilation of the negro into our social and political life as our equal.” – Abraham Lincoln
After Lincoln’s assassination, the prevailing policy in America was one of reconstruction, not repatriation. This process accelerated under the administration of former Union General Ulysses S. Grant, whose civil rights policies appeased the Radical Republicans of the time.
THE JEWISH ROLE IN INTEGRATION & MULTICULTURALISM
The races remained largely segregated until the 1950s and 1960s, when Plessy v. Ferguson was overturned by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education; Jim Crow laws were repealed; the Civil Rights Act was passed in the mid-1960s; and whites were forced to accept racial integration at gunpoint.
It is quite astonishing that Jews — who played an instrumental role in the transport of African slaves to this continent — were also the driving force behind racial integration between blacks and whites. The NAACP was a predominantly Jewish organization in its formative years; many of Martin Luther King Jr.’s speeches were composed by Stanley David Levinson, a Jewish Communist; and according to Howard Sachar of myjewishlearning.com, “Many local and state desegregation regulations actually were drafted in the offices of the Jewish agencies.”
It is equally astounding that Jewish Supremacists, who advocate racial homogeneity for Israel, simultaneously promote multiculturalism and diversity for traditionally white nations. This double standard couldn’t be any more obvious. As long as other groups (e.g., Palestinians) are not infringed upon — and no U.S. tax dollars are wasted — Jews have every right to take steps to preserve their heritage. Every group of people should have this right, and people of European heritage are no exception.
Whereas Israel is effectively sealing off its borders to mitigate the inflow of outsiders, the floodgates remain open in the U.S. and other white-majority nations. The Jewish Supremacists and white sellouts — like Bill Clinton — share culpability. I will deal with the former, as many people remain unaware of the influential Jewish role in integration, immigration, and forced diversity.
Just as Jews have a vested interest in enforcing protectionism for the Israeli state, they also have a vested interest in flooding our countries with non-white immigrants. On the latter, Charles Silberman, author of A Certain People: American Jews and Their Lives Today, wrote:
“American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief, one firmly rooted in history, that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse “gay rights” and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called “social issues.”
As you can see, prevailing Jewish values are incompatible with ours. However, as Jews account for only 2% of the total population, they cannot win their battles without some help — which is why they have attempted to liberalize the majority population in the U.S. and West, and have also provided unyielding support for the immigration of peoples whose cultures and ideologies conflict with ours.
The Immigration Act of 1965 — which ushered in an era of non-white preference in immigration policy — was predominately influenced by powerful Jewish Congressmen and lobbyists. After this law was enacted, Jews in America rejoiced! Earl Raab, executive director of the Perlmutter Institute of Jewish Advocacy and associate of the ADL, wrote the following in the Jewish Bulletin:
“It was only after World War II that immigration law was drastically changed to eliminate such discrimination. In one of the first pieces of evidence of its political coming-of-age, the Jewish community has a leadership role in effecting those changes.”
He went onto applaud the demographic shift that has taken place in the United States over the past half-century, stating that:
“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.
We [i.e., Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”
It is worth noting that the “Nazi-Aryan party” would never have risen to power in Germany were it not for Jews infiltrating — and subsequently corrupting — the most important institutions in the Wiemar Republic, just as they have done in the United States since WWII. In Main Kampf, Adolf Hitler laid out quite eloquently his reasons for turning against the Jews of his time. While I personally do not advocate Hitleresque measures, I do believe it to be necessary for whites — at least those who would prefer not to live in a multicultural society run by Jews — to form our own government that would enforce racial homogeneity and represent our sociopolitical interests. This is clearly not possible in America today. Essentially, my proposed white nation would be to White Nationalists what Israel is to the Jews. Only we would rely exclusively on ourselves for national defense.
The Jews being expelled from more than 100 locations throughout human history can be attributed to self-preservation (on the part of the host civilization), not antisemitism. If whites wish to preserve their heritage, they must first jettison the cancerous Jewish influence, for their values are diametrically opposed to ours. The time is now. We can ill-afford to wait until we become the minority population in the country we established. I repeat: the time is now!
Source blog: http://nofeministsallowed.blogspot.com
The Silent Genocide of the White Race
Part I: Introduction
This is perhaps the most important series of articles that I will ever post on this site. It is a documentation of the genocide being waged against my people, not only in the United States, but in all traditionally white nations. Without our consent, the powers that be are deliberately transforming the demographic makeup of our homelands; destroying our heritage; breaking down our people; and promoting diversity, multiculturalism, race-mixing, and white guilt that will eventually transform our society into a raceless dystopia. To them, a homogeneous population is acceptable only when everybody is a shade of brown — with dark hair, dark eyes, and dark skin.
Whites are actually the most diverse race found in the human species. A greater number of phenotypes are possible amongst whites. Whites can have blue, brown, green, gray, or hazel eyes. We can also have blond, black, red, or various shades of brown hair — as well as gray hair in our later years. This degree of genetic diversity does not exist for any other race on the planet.
Furthermore, as the contributions of whites have been numerous and significant throughout history, it would be in everybody’s best interest to preserve the race that introduced to civilization: automobiles, airplanes, trains, telephones, televisions, radios, computers, cameras, electricity, atomic energy, and myriad other inventions and innovations.
Although the atrocities committed by those of European descent are constantly emphasized in history books, it must be noted that whites certainly were not the only race who held slaves and intruded on other people’s lands. Europe had to fend off several invasions throughout history, the most notable of which were:
* During the 8th Century, Muslim armies conquered the Iberian Peninsula and subsequently marched into other parts of Western Europe, where they were eventually forced to retreat. Many historians claim that Charles Martel’s victory at the Battle of Tours saved Western Christendom from Islamic takeover.
* As mentioned above, Genghis Khan’s large, powerful Mongol army swept into Russia and Eastern Europe during the 1200s before withdrawing back eastward.
* Around the time of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, North African pirates raided parts of Europe and enslaved more than a million European Christians in the 250 years between 1530 and 1780. As one blogger wrote, “The male slaves were usually used for the galleys, the mines, or other hard work. Women, especially the beautiful ones, were put to other uses.” You never read about this incident of slavery in your history books, did you?
The most recent invasion of white homelands is taking place today, and is being facilitated by those who seek our utter demise, namely Jewish Supremacists and white sellouts in power. While the Silent Genocide is more insidious than previous conquest attempts, the intentions of our enemies remain unchanged. The deliberate flooding of our homelands with non-white immigrants is widespread, sparing no traditionally white nation.
Worldwide, people of European descent — which made up more than a quarter of the world’s population in 1950 — will see their numbers shrink to less than 10% by 2060, according to the latest projections. Baring a successful uprising by whites in the near-future, non-whites will watch their numbers (and consequently, their political power) increase exponentially, until they reach the critical mass needed to overtake whites once and for all. In this series, I will discuss the primary causes of this demographic crisis, as well as who is behind what I call the Silent Genocide.
This series will be broken up into the following sections:
Part I: Introduction
Part II: The United States
Part III: The Dark Continent
Part IV: Our Ancestral Homelands
Part V: Conclusion
Source blog: http://nofeministsallowed.blogspot.com
The following speech was delivered by top of the class student Erica Goldson during the graduation ceremony at Coxsackie-Athens High School on June 25, 2010.
[Abridged by Henry Makow]
I am graduating. I should look at this as a positive experience, especially being at the top of my class. However, in retrospect, I cannot say that I am any more intelligent than my peers. I can attest that I am only the best at doing what I am told and working the system.
Yet, here I stand, and I am supposed to be proud that I have completed this period of indoctrination. I will leave in the fall to go on to the next phase expected of me, in order to receive a paper document that certifies that I am capable of work.
But I contest that I am a human being, a thinker, an adventurer – not a worker. A worker is someone who is trapped within repetition – a slave of the system set up before him. But now, I have successfully shown that I was the best slave. I did what I was told to the extreme. While others sat in class and doodled to later become great artists, I sat in class to take notes and become a great test-taker.
While others would come to class without their homework done because they were reading about an interest of theirs, I never missed an assignment. While others were creating music and writing lyrics, I decided to do extra credit, even though I never needed it. So, I wonder, why did I even want this position? Sure, I earned it, but what will come of it? When I leave educational institutionalism, will I be successful or forever lost?
I have no clue about what I want to do with my life; I have no interests because I saw every subject of study as work, and I excelled at every subject just for the purpose of excelling, not learning. And quite frankly, now I’m scared.
John Taylor Gatto, a retired school teacher and activist critical of compulsory schooling, asserts, “We could encourage the best qualities of youthfulness – curiosity, adventure, resilience, the capacity for surprising insight simply by being more flexible about time, texts, and tests, by introducing kids into truly competent adults, and by giving each student what autonomy he or she needs in order to take a risk every now and then. But we don’t do that.”
Between these cinder block walls, we are all expected to be the same. We are trained to ace every standardized test, and those who deviate and see light through a different lens are worthless to the scheme of public education, and therefore viewed with contempt.
H. L. Mencken wrote in The American Mercury for April 1924 that the aim of public education is not “to fill the young of the species with knowledge and awaken their intelligence. … Nothing could be further from the truth. The aim … is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality. That is its aim in the United States whatever pretensions of politicians, pedagogues other such mountebanks, and that is its aim everywhere else.”
The Personality Traits of Feminists
by http://www.theghostnation.com
If you are a feminist, you do not sincerely believe in God, you endorse Zionism, rectal sodomites, violence, police brutality, are two-faced, a liar, treacherous, a prospective adulterer, swear a lot, disorganized, vulgar, angry, a hacker and cybercriminal, untrustworthy, unfair, unjust, you share private information, are a misandrist, you commit blackmail and extortion, you are unpatriotic, you do not support the Constitution, are not humble, you hate straight whitey, have an erratic temperament, raise your voice to get a point across, are a sexual deviant, sadistic, violent, manipulative, fake friendships, enthusiastically associate with criminals, Zionists, sociopaths and psychopaths, cheat, are worthless and nonconstructive, are anti-heterosexual, heterophobic, atheist, agnostic, engage in gang-stalking, promote ugliness and scatology, do not respect other’s privacy, and do not believe that all rectal sodomites are homosexuals.
You’re a “Fascist” if…
By Henry Makow, Ph.D.
You’re a fascist if:
1. You believe in God, and a moral and spiritual order.
2. You believe in democracy.
3. You believe your country should retain its racial character and not be inundated by immigrants so that it becomes unrecognizable. You believe that if Israel can enact laws to protect its racial character, so can North America, Europe and Australia.
4. You believe in the sanctity of marriage and family. You believe in gender differences. You believe, along with many homosexuals, that homosexuality is not a lifestyle choice but a developmental disorder.
5. You resist the plan of a Masonic international financial cartel, the central bankers, to integrate your country into a tyrannical world government which they control through their puppets.
6. You believe the mass media is controlled by a handful of tycoons beholden to this cartel. You believe it routinely propagandizes and deceives.
7. You believe the government has been subverted by this cartel, and most leading politicians are Freemasons beholden to it. You want politicians to represent the national interest.
8. You believe *** *** is a “Manchurian candidate,” essentially an artificially created front-man for this cartel. He was born in Kenya. He is not an American, was never a real law professor. There is no record of his academic achievement.
In other words, you’re a fascist if you know the truth and uphold it.
You’re fascist if you believe in the highest values of Western civilization.
31 Reasons Why Being A Nice Guy Sucks
By Tyler
Here are a few reasons why you may not want to be that nice guy you thought you were suppose to be.
1.You get to become her little favor boy. (Buy her stuff, do favors for her, and get nothing back in return.)
2.You get a kiss on the cheek, but never where you really want it.
3.You get to poor out your feelings for her just so you can hear “I had no idea that you felt that way.”
4.You get to watch the woman of your dreams date one jerk after another.
5.You will spend many nights alone.
6.You will spend more time watching porn then you will making your own porn.
7.You will spend lots of money taking women to expensive restaurants while some other guy takes women for a walk in the park and gets laid doing it.
8.You will have to take whatever woman that will have you rather then the woman that you really want.
9.You will spend more time dreaming and fantasizing about the dating life you want rather then living the dating life you want.
10. You have to listen to women tell you what a great guy you are, how nice you are, and how sweet you are. Those same women would never want to date you.
11. You get to have women cry on your shoulders.
12. Women will love to talk to you because they can tell you all about their problems.
13. You will call many women only for them to never return your call.
14. You will have to hear women tell you that your not their type.
15. Women tell you all the time that they are busy. That same woman will call you up later because she needs to talk about her problems or she will want you to do a favor for her.
16. You get to live your life thinking that someday the right woman will come along who will treat you nice and want you back.
17. You get to believe that being really nice is the right way to make a woman love you.
18. You spend your entire life believing that by being really nice your simply being yourself.
19. You will eventually find a woman who will want to marry you just because you are nice.
20. Your future wife who married you because you are nice will eventually cheat on you do to “nice guy boredom syndrome.”
21. Women will push you around as if you were a nobody.
22. You will be expected to buy women many drinks at the bar.
23. You will buy a woman her favorite flowers only for her to shove them to the side or throw them out all together.
24. You will approach many women thinking that you are bothering her instead of thinking your the best thing to ever happen to her.
25. You might set a world record for trying to woo the same woman for many years.
26. You will work your $#@ off thinking that you need to be rich, drive a great car, and live in a mansion only to find out that the best woman you can get is a gold digger.
27. You get to make your mom proud for being so darn nice.
28. You will respect women only to find out that women don’t respect you.
29. Women will tell you how much they want to meet a nice guy. Unfortunately, as nice as you are, they don’t see you as that nice guy that they want to meet.
30. People will tell you to just be yourself even when that’s what you think that you have been doing all along.
31. Women will mistaken you as one of their girlfriends or as a SAD.
Even in Sex, Man is Enslaved
by Pooks Mill
“. They like eating, drinking, sleeping – even sex, providing there is nothing to do and no real effort is required of them. Unlike a man, a woman will rarely make an effort to get her partner into bed. If, however, he is already there and she hasn’t planned to set her hair or undertake some other form of large-scale beauty repair and there is no TV programme she wants to see, she will not be averse to making love, provided he is prepared to be the active partner.
“But even the euphemisms ‘active’ for the male partner and ‘passive’ for the female do not conceal the fact that woman allows man to serve her in bed just as he does in every sphere of her life. Even through intercourse may give a man pleasure in the long run, it is nothiing more than a service to a woman, in which the man is the better lover, arousing desire more skillfully, quickly, and making it last longer.
“Men suspect that women tend to exploit them during intercourse and have developed a certain fear of female sexual appetite. “Signs of this appear in the rites of ancient cultures, in philosophical works of men such as Schopenhauer and Nietzche, in the novels of Baudelaire, Balzac an dMontherlant, in plays by Strindberg, O’Neill and Tennessee Williams. Since the discovery of contraceptives, this fear has reached almost hysterical proportions.”
I have spoken much about sexual transmutation of men in the past. Men can utilize their sexual desire to make it bloom into their art, their music, their work, their actions, to make their life progress swifter and increase their resonance among people (i.e. “charisma”). As a salesman myself, I know that the highly sexualized people make the better salesmen while the lower sexualized people (of both men and women) become stuck with low sales.
One gender’s transmutation is another gender’s manipulation. At least, this is what the feminists say when they point to the great works of Humanity.
We know that most men do not understand transmutation. They can often just live an animal existence and try to hump the nearest female in sight. These men generally end up mediocre in life. Keep in mind, I am referring not to the highly sexualized male but the male who submits to his sexuality, rather than forging the sexuality into what he desires. Think of the trunk in high school who ended up getting a girl pregnant and is doomed to a life of paying for it.
Most women, also, do not understand transmutation. The “slut feminism” is merely that of an animal existence.
However, women do undergo transmutation. They sexualize themselves as much as possible meaning through exercise, tight clothes, long hair, make-up, and so on to and undergo training in dance and other things. The woman will become trapped in her own game (as Radical Vilar #2 will reveal) but she is certainly trying to get the wealthiest and socially desired male.
Some women (mostly feminists) will resort to writing bad books about female goddesses and the occult as well as being mesmerized by Egyptian mythology. These women are confusing their sexuality with their faith and have the shoes on backward. Nevertheless, they are trying to project that sexuality in some means. This would explain why such women are often extremely ugly.
It is quite common for women to declare men are all pigs who want nothing but sex. But if you have ever tried to eliminate sex from a budding relationship, the woman goes bonkers. She has no mind of herself, just her animal existence, and she projects that onto the men. “All men want is sex!” Well, ma’am, when was the last time a woman said something even remotely
abstract? Even with feminist theory, all they do is regurgitate verbatim what is heard. There are still no new ideas. The original nut of feminist theory is just a cliche with zombie girls echoing the cliche.
But let us listen some more.
“In truth, reliable contraceptives (invented by a man, naturally) have robbed man of the only triumph left to him in his state of sexual subjugation. Previously, woman was always to a certain extend at his mercy. Now she is suddenly in control. She can have as many children as she wishes. She can even select the father (rich, if possible). If she has no intention of having children, she can indulge in intercourse as often as it appears advantageous to her. Men cannot do that.” Pg. 80-81
This is a good question. Have contraceptives increased man’s power or woman’s? Obviously, it is woman’s whose fortune has doubled. She can now be the slut and be free from most of the consequences. This was much more difficult in the past.
I suspect contraceptives have been historically banned because of men insisting it so. This would explain why the ancient religions all banned contraceptives. Christianity banned all contraceptives unanimously until around 1928. It also finally explains why Onanism was frowned at (a man emptying his seed outside the woman). It kept giving the woman power.
Sex has two main long term consequences (not counting short term pleasure). One, it creates children. Two, it enslaves a man.
With contraceptives, the children element is removed but the enslavement of men are not.
“But Pook! But Pook!” you cry. “Would this not free the men too? All these women and little consequences?”
The changing definitions of man by the moderns have help emasculate men. A false definition is worse than a slander. But the definition of “man” as supported by the moderns is a man who has sex with as many females as possible. There is no historical basis for this. What was the definition of a “man” was the man WHO HAD THE MOST CHILDREN. This is why centuries ago, familes would range from eight to fourteen children. Men who were impotent and could not have children strived to display their manliness in some other way (such as America’s George Washington).
The more children, the more new people were under the man’s name. He became the leader of the household. He became the Patriarch in this way.
By pinning the definition of sex on ‘as banging as many females as possible’, one can pinpoint the further enslavements to men:
1) the married man keeps demanding sex from his wife who she can easily manipulate the man further based on such desire.
2) the bachelor throws his time away (which is more valuable than money) on playing the ‘game’ to get as many girls as possible. Women will manipulate the guy for entertainment, social access, and even money.
3) the guy throws his money away (less valuable than time) at prositutes, both offical and unofficial, just so he can ‘feel like a man’.
We know that for men, sex is very much a mental thing. Alter the brainwashing and free yourself.
It is hilarious when someone tries to defend this definition of man using evolutionary behavior. Evolution only works if you have children you $%#@!#. When I see demographic reports of less and less children born in each generation, I assure you that is not evolution in work: it is extinction.
Vilar goes on speaking how much women research sex and how it involves men (to ‘rock his world to enslave them’ essentially).
“Contrary to man’s fear, women do not, however, weigh one man against another and choose the most virile- far from it, as she herself is not all that keen on sex. In view of that, and provided all other conditions are equal, she is likely to prefer the less potent man because she can always blackmail him with her intimate knowledge of his weakness. “In the realm of sex, more than any other, man is a victim of the principles of efficiency according to which he is manipulated.”
You never hear about any pressure for the woman to ‘perform’. The only thing you hear about that is if the woman cannot keep the man (i.e. manipulate him). This would explain why when a wife cheats, the husband “fails” and the wife is a “victim”. And if the husband cheats, the husband “fails” and the wife is again the “victim”.
“That sexual competence in a man is a matter of indifference to the majority of females is shown by the number of highly paid men who marry and stay married, despite the fact that they are impotent (it is unimaginable that a woman without a vagina would have an prospects whatsoever of getting married to a normally sexed man).” Pg. 84
A young man is often amazed that dating is really nothing more than sex. Women don’t want to know you. They do not care about your dreams. The bait on the hook is sex and the purpose is to reel you in. Women’s greatest fear is the celibate man as he cannot be hooked in any way.
